About Renata Kessler
Renata Kessler writes the psychology guides on this site: what the research says about tilt, near-misses, rituals and the state players call the zone.
She is a writer, not a clinician, and does not claim to be one. Every psychological claim in her guides is one that appears in published, peer-reviewed literature, and the sources are linked so readers can check them rather than take her word for it.
She writes for this site independently. She is not employed by any casino operator, has no access to operator data, and does not have player session records — a limitation she states in the guides rather than working around it.
Where the evidence is contested, her guides say so. Where a popular technique has no support behind it, they say that too, which is why several of them spend as much space on what does not work as on what does.
Her guides avoid the framing that dominates this subject: the suggestion that the right mental state converts a losing game into a winning one. It does not, and every guide she writes says so explicitly.
The recurring point in her writing is that psychology changes exposure, not odds — how long a session runs and how large the stakes get, never the mathematics underneath.
How Renata Writes a Guide
Every psychological claim links to a published source, and claims without one do not go in.
Where research is contested or preliminary, the guide says so instead of presenting a single study as settled.
No claim is made about player data, session counts or internal testing, because she has access to none of those.
Guides are revisited when the underlying research changes, and corrections are made in place rather than left standing.
Articles by Renata Kessler
4
August 6, 2026
A twenty-bet losing run is an ordinary property of independent outcomes, not a message. What helps afterwards is short, dull and set in advance — and what feels most natural is the one thing that reliably makes it worse.
Explore more
March 2, 2026
The near-miss, the illusion of control, the gambler's fallacy and loss chasing are the four effects with the most research behind them. Here is what each one does, and the short list of things that measurably help.
Explore more
April 28, 2026
The lucky seat, the tap before the spin, the particular order of things. None of it touches the outcome, and the reason it feels otherwise is one of the best-documented effects in behavioural science.
Explore more
July 4, 2026
Losing track of time at a poker table and losing track of time at a slot are not the same state, and only one of them is flow. What the research separates, and why the difference matters.
Explore more